JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 5, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera

✓Claimant Ruben Dario Restrepo Rodriguez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Debe adoptar medidas necesarias para que el fallo se cumpla y conocer de incidentes de desacato por desconocimiento de órdenes dadas
Medidas Cautelares
  • Requisitos para decretarlas
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU.067/22.

El memorialista pidió a la Corporación, entre otras cosas, decretar medidas provisionales y la creación de una Sala de Seguimiento para asegurar la coherencia y unidad del debate jurídico resuelto en el precitado fallo.

Luego de constatar el incumplimiento del requisito de legitimación por activa del peticionario, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR las pretensiones invocadas por éste.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR las solicitudes de práctica de medida cautelar y constitución de sala de seguimiento, presentadas por Rubén Darío Restrepo Rodríguez, respecto de la Sentencia SU-067 de 2022.
  2. SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al solicitante que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.